• Login|
  • Contact Us|

  United States

Americas

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Middle East

Brazil China France United Arab Emirates
Canada India Germany  
USA Japan Greece  
  Singapore Italy  
  Taiwan Kazakhstan  
  Thailand Netherlands  
    Poland  
    Portugal  
    Russia  
    Spain  
    Ukraine  
    United Kingdom  
       
       


 

Global Fairness Opinion

Sohu.com, China’s leading online media service, was planning the sale of 17173.com, its online game portal, to its subsidiary Changyou.com. Was the proposed transaction fair, from a financial point of view?


Sohu.com, China’s premier online brand, provides users with a wide array of information, communication and entertainment choices, including search engine www.sogou.com, online mapping service provider www.go2map.com and various other sites. Changyou.com, in which Sohu is a majority shareholder, develops and operates some of China’s most popular online games. To bring together its two leading gaming-related businesses, Sohu planned to sell its online gaming information portal, www.17173.com, to Changyou.

Per the transaction agreement, Changyou would acquire all of the assets associated with 17173.com for consideration of US$162.5 million. Various services and support agreements were also involved. Due to the transaction’s significance, as well as its status as a related-party transaction, both Changyou and Sohu wanted assurance of the transaction’s fairness, from a financial point of view. Thus, the Audit Committees of both companies sought third-party fairness opinions.

In early November, Sohu’s Audit Committee retained American Appraisal for fairness opinion services.  The client service team from American Appraisal’s China and US offices worked seamlessly to perform various analyses within the Audit Committee’s requested time frame.

On November 29, 2011, American Appraisal rendered its opinion to Sohu’s Audit Committee that the proposed transaction was fair, from a financial point of view; the firm retained by Changyou’s Audit Committee reached the same opinion. The transaction closed on December 15, 2011, and is expected to create synergies that, over the long term, will increase the value of both businesses.

Read more about our fairness opinion practice

 

Services

         

Financial
Reporting



Business Combinations

Impairment Testing

Equity-Based Compensation

Financial Instruments
IFRS
Fresh Start Accounting

Tax
Valuation



Purchase Price Allocation
Corporate Tax Valuation Services
IRC §409A and Stock Valuation
Gift & Estate Tax

Cost Segregation

Transfer Pricing

§861 Interest Expense

Property Tax

Property Insurance
Appraisal &
Valuation


Building Insurance Appraisal
& Inspection

Equipment/Personal Property Insurance Appraisal & Inventory

Property Insurance
Appraisal Update

Web-Based Reporting

Fixed Asset Management



Fixed Asset Inventory & Reconciliation

Fixed Asset
Componentization

IT Asset Inventory

Property Record
Outsourcing Services

Transaction
Consulting



Fairness Opinions

Solvency Opinions

Asset Purchase,
Sale or Lease

Asset Financing

Advisory


 


Litigation Support

Appraisal Reviews

Intellectual Property Valuation

Bankruptcy & Restructuring

Real Estate Advisory

Portfolio Valuation

Right of Way Appraisal Services

Industries

     

 

       

 

Aerospace & Defense

Agribusiness, Food & Beverage

Chemicals

Consumer Products & Services

Financial Services & Transaction Processing

Government

Healthcare

Higher Education

Hospitality & Gaming

Insurance

Manufacturing

Media & Entertainment

Metals & Mining

Oil & Gas

Paper, Packaging & Forest Products

Pharmaceuticals

Professional Services

Real Estate

Technology & Electronics

Telecommunications

Transportation

Utilities & Power Generation

 


 
Follow us

 

Privacy /
Terms of Use / Corporate Governance