• Login|
  • Contact Us|

  United States

Americas

Asia-Pacific

Europe

Middle East

Brazil China France United Arab Emirates
Canada India Germany  
USA Japan Greece  
  Singapore Italy  
  Taiwan Kazakhstan  
  Thailand Netherlands  
    Poland  
    Portugal  
    Russia  
    Spain  
    Ukraine  
    United Kingdom  
       
       


 

Share

SEC Staff Report on IFRS Switch

In July, the SEC released its long-awaited Staff Report containing recommendations concerning the potential switch to International Financial Reporting Standards by US issuers of financial statements: Work Plan for the Consideration of Incorporating International Financial Reporting Standards into the Financial Reporting System for U.S. Issuers.

The Work Plan contains various factors relevant to a decision by the Commission as to whether, when and how US issuers should transition to a system incorporating IFRS.  Although the report provides a thorough discussion of the issues pertaining to IFRS in the United States, it does not include a recommendation on whether US public companies should be allowed or required to adopt IFRS for financial reporting, nor should it be construed as an indication of an official SEC position. The SEC is expected to make a recommendation regarding IFRS; however, no timetable has been established. 

A summary of the Staff’s findings follows:

Development of IFRS

The Staff Report acknowledges significant progress toward the development of a comprehensive set of accounting standards, but notes that certain areas continue to be underdeveloped, including accounting for extractive, insurance and rate-regulated industries. The report also acknowledges that US GAAP contains areas where additional guidance is required; however, the gaps in IFRS are greater.

Interpretive Process

The SEC Staff acknowledged recently implemented changes that will address the maintenance of IFRS standards and provide authoritative guidance on issues; however, the Staff is uncertain at this point whether these changes will be effective.

IASB Use of National Standard Setters

The Staff Report states, “In order to develop accounting standards that could be incorporated in multiple jurisdictions, the IASB needs to understand the intricacies of a number of distinct domestic reporting and regulatory systems. This challenge can be difficult in the best of circumstances.” The Staff acknowledges that the IASB has procedures for interacting with national standard setters.  Further, the IASB has procedures for interacting with national standard setters on individual projects, and meets with a significant number of national standard setters periodically to discuss accounting issues and IASB projects.  However, the Staff believes the IASB should consider even greater reliance on national standard setters:  “The national standard setters could assist with individual projects for which they have expertise, perform outreach for individual projects to the national standard setter’s home country investors, identify areas in which there is a need to narrow diversity in practice or issue interpretive guidance, and assist with post-implementation reviews.”

Global Application and Enforcement

The Staff Report acknowledges the perceived benefit of a single set of high-quality, globally accepted accounting standards, such that investors can read a set of financial statements for any company, understand its financial results and make comparisons to those of other companies.  However, to derive such benefits, it is imperative that such standards are consistently applied and enforced.  The results of the Staff’s review of financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS showed that the application of IFRS could be improved to narrow diversity.  As stated in the report, “The Staff believes that the financial reporting community, including the SEC, can be a constructive influence on the consistent application and enforcement of IFRS.”

Governance of the IASB

As might be expected with a global organization, the IASB does not have a mandate to establish standards for any single capital market.  Therefore, with respect to US investors and capital markets, “the Staff believes that it may be necessary to put in place mechanisms specifically to consider and to protect the US capital markets – for example, maintaining an active FASB to endorse IFRSs.”

Status of Funding

Because the IFRS Foundation is a private, not-for-profit organization, it lacks a funding mechanism, and “the Staff’s most significant concern about the funding approach is the continued reliance on the large public accounting firms to provide funds to the IASB.”

Investor Understanding

As stated in the report, “The Staff observed that investor education on accounting issues and changes in the accounting standards is not uniform.  Regardless of the ultimate determination by the Commission as to whether to incorporate IFRS, the Staff will consider how investor engagement and education related to the development and use of accounting standards could be improved.”

 

Services

         

Financial
Reporting



Business Combinations

Impairment Testing

Equity-Based Compensation

Financial Instruments
IFRS
Fresh Start Accounting

Tax
Valuation



Purchase Price Allocation
Corporate Tax Valuation Services
IRC §409A and Stock Valuation
Gift & Estate Tax

Cost Segregation

Transfer Pricing

§861 Interest Expense

Property Tax

Property Insurance
Appraisal &
Valuation


Building Insurance Appraisal
& Inspection

Equipment/Personal Property Insurance Appraisal & Inventory

Property Insurance
Appraisal Update

Web-Based Reporting

Fixed Asset Management



Fixed Asset Inventory & Reconciliation

Fixed Asset
Componentization

IT Asset Inventory

Property Record
Outsourcing Services

Transaction
Consulting



Fairness Opinions

Solvency Opinions

Asset Purchase,
Sale or Lease

Asset Financing

Advisory


 


Litigation Support

Appraisal Reviews

Intellectual Property Valuation

Bankruptcy & Restructuring

Real Estate Advisory

Portfolio Valuation

Right of Way Appraisal Services

Industries

     

 

       

 

Aerospace & Defense

Agribusiness, Food & Beverage

Chemicals

Consumer Products & Services

Financial Services & Transaction Processing

Government

Healthcare

Higher Education

Hospitality & Gaming

Insurance

Manufacturing

Media & Entertainment

Metals & Mining

Oil & Gas

Paper, Packaging & Forest Products

Pharmaceuticals

Professional Services

Real Estate

Technology & Electronics

Telecommunications

Transportation

Utilities & Power Generation

 


 
Follow us

 

Privacy /
Terms of Use / Corporate Governance